We’ve Lost Our Focus. The Reason Behind SHRINKFLATION

I read once that what we focus on is what we head towards. The deeper meaning didn’t register immediately, but I understood the basic premise of the saying. It was a while later whilst watching motorcycle racing on the television that the true meaning revealed itself to me. The event was a World Superbike race, and two riders were battling for the lead position. The viewing perspective changed to the onboard camera that was pointing at the rider, and you could see the rider’s helmet and visor as he approached a fast left-hand corner. As he leaned the bike into the corner, his head turned to the left at a more acute angle than the bike was turning. “He’s not looking where he’s going, isn’t that dangerous?”, commented my wife. As a lifelong motorcyclist myself, I explained that you always concentrated on the exit of a turn or a corner, as bikes don’t have steering wheels and you have to use your body weight and positioning to change the direction of the bike. It was then that the metaphoric light bulb over my head switched on and I truly understood the meaning of the saying. What you focus on is what you head towards.

Travel on Route 66, California, USA.

To carry on with the motorcycling analogy, I realised that this saying was the underpinning basis of motorcycling safety. As part of learning defensive riding, you are taught to always look for your escape route or exit. If a vehicle pulls out in front of you, immediately look to see a path that will not only avoid the vehicle, but will also not put you in further danger. This is something that I was never taught when learning to drive a car, and I believe this is why so many people have crashes. Drivers tend to concentrate on the car that has just pulled out in front of them rather than trying to avoid it and inevitably the two collide. In the US, there is a famous stretch of straight road that goes for mile after mile across endless desert. The local state troopers are amazed at the constant stream of accidents they are called out to where drivers have embedded the front of their vehicle into a telegraph pole. With mile after mile of straight road and an unchanging view out of the windscreen, a telegraph pole can become fascinating. What you focus on is what you head towards!

I soon realised that this principle can be applied to all areas of your life and if adhered to diligently, it can make a world of difference. How many people make plans to do something, whether it’s to get a new job, or to lose weight, only to find that a few short weeks later they are no further forward with their plans. Sure, CVs were sent off, the gym was attended and in the first couple of weeks the enthusiasm was high. But when the results don’t materialise quite as quickly as we would like that enthusiasm starts to wan. We start to find excuses not to do that workout, or we persuade ourselves that we quite like our current job, and anyway, we might get that promotion after all. In short, we lose our focus. No matter how detailed our initial plans were to achieve our goals, without dedicated focus, our attention soon starts to drift.

Don’t worry, this isn’t some motivational diatribe aimed at pumping you up to change your life in ten easy steps! No, instead, what I want to explore is just how our focus can affect and change the outcomes of our actions. More importantly, it is when we examine the focus of those around us, that we start to see the true picture and understand what is going on. A short while ago, I wrote a piece on this blog about how I had the answer to all the world’s problems The Answer To The World’s Problems! ALL OF THEM!! – abolish money!

Now, on the basis that this is highly unlikely to happen anytime soon, perhaps we need to analyse our attitude towards money and especially where it relates to the world of commerce and industry. Once upon a time, a company would offer a product or service, and money was a by-product of offering these said products or services. A well-made product or well delivered service would result not only in the proffering of money in exchange, but also the promise of further revenue for the supply of more of the same products and services. The focus of the company would be to ensure that their products and services maintain the standards that their customers had come to expect, and this would be their reassurance to place repeat business in the future. Not only this, but the company would grow a reputation for supplying great quality products and services and this is how they would grow their customer base. Word would get around, the wheels of marketing would turn and slowly but surely the company would grow. More products and services would be sold and in turn the company’s revenue would increase. Happy days!! But should the quality decrease, so would the sales and ultimately the revenue, so the focus was always on maintaining the quality that company’s reputation was built on.

Businessman standing in front of projection screen. Projector reflects dollar signs to screen and businessman’s back.

Change the focus though and the picture begins to change. Slowly, as the company grows and revenues increase, the things that were paramount in importance start to be replaced by new goals and directives. Things such as quality, value for money and high levels of service start to slip as they are replaced by gross margins, working capital and EBITDA. Financial metrics start to become the new focus. To some degree, it makes sense, as staff need to be paid, suppliers need paying and you need to ensure that you can keep the lights and heating on.

In the day-to-day hubbub of everyday business, it is easy to lose sight of the things that really contribute to these financial metrics. Namely, maintaining high standards of quality and ensuring that your customers are happy. Instead, the attention is drawn to the rising wages bill, how are we going to pay the suppliers on time and thoughts slip to how we can make savings instead.

In short, the focus shifts towards money. How many of us have been told by our boss, that, “it’s all about the bottom line”; “this is a business and not a charity; “it’s all about making money”. As money becomes the main focus, attention to quality and value for money shrink ever smaller. As revenue and profits start to plateau, companies look to other means to hold their profits. On one side of the equation, you have revenue and on the other you have costs. If one side isn’t going up, you need to reduce the other and this means, cutting staff, lowering wages, renegotiating purchasing contracts, or looking for alternative, cheaper suppliers. With the combination of less staff doing more work along with the quality of the raw materials dwindling, it doesn’t take long for the quality of the product to decline. However, the company has no intention of lowering their prices, so the result is the customer getting an inferior product and therefore less value for their money.

This is nothing new and we have all experienced this a lot over the years. However, real costs now being almost as low as they can go, companies are having to look to new areas in order make these savings and what I am talking about is a relatively new phenomenon – shrinkflation! At first it was quite surreptitious, and a lot of people didn’t notice. The size of things seemed to shrink. That chocolate bar that we remember as being huge as a kid now seems a tad smaller. “No, it’s not!”, the manufacturer cries, “It’s just that your hands were a lot smaller as a child!”. That must be it, we try and persuade ourselves, but deep down we know it’s not quite true.

Thinking they have got away with it, the shrinkflation continues. Products continue to get incrementally smaller, packets of biscuits now contain two or three less than before, multi-packs now have one less item, but in every case the price remains the same. The quality of the raw materials and ingredients used gets compromised and slowly we start to notice that things don’t last quite as long, or taste quite the same. Still, we continue to pay the same price.

In one case, a food manufacturer was accused of using horse meat in some of its products as a replacement for beef. And again, with no amendment to the price to take this into account – even if using horse meat had even been acceptable in the first place.

The other tactic to hoodwink us into thinking that lowering quality standards is acceptable is another new phenomenon – inbuilt obsolescence. No longer are products built to last as long as possible. Kitchen appliances last for mere moments in comparison to the lifetime that they seemed to last. Hell, I remember my mother using the same vacuum cleaner for my entire childhood and we had a fridge that lasted for well over twenty years. Not any longer. We are now told that it is better if we replace our electrical items and gadgets every couple of years, but no one can ever give a satisfactory reason to back this up. And just who does it benefit – us the consumers, the environment perhaps?? No, of course not. The only ones to benefit are the manufacturers.

And why? It is down to the all-consuming pursuit of the dollar (please substitute the currency appropriate to your own region! 😊). The focus is on money and nothing else. How can these companies make more for less. How can they maximise their profits. How can they placate their shareholders. How can they grab a larger share of the marketplace. How can they satiate their never-ending greed. And who pays the price? The real price?

You and me, of course.

If only there was an answer.

Well, there is. Change the focus. Remove it altogether.

Abolish money!!

The Answer To The World’s Problems! ALL OF THEM!!

Well, that’s a bold claim, I hear you cry, or is this just another clickbait title to entice me to read on. Okay, it may be a bold statement and a little tongue-in-cheek, but I believe the basic premise of my idea is sound in principle.

My idea to solve the world’s problems – abolish MONEY!!!! That’s right, you read that correctly, abolish money. But that’s crazy! What will we do instead, how will we manage! The world will descend into anarchy and madness as everyone will go on a massive looting rampage.

Before you dismiss my idea, let me try to rationalise it by analysing some of the main “problems” that blight our world, but first, exactly what are these problems, or at least what are the main categories these problems fall into –

  • Famine and hunger
  • Poverty
  • Disease and inadequate healthcare
  • War and conflict

And now, what are the main contributing factors that cause and help to perpetuate these problems –

  • Famine and hunger
    • Lack of investment and funding by governments to maintain and sustain food production, from farming through to the manufacture and distribution of food.
  • Poverty
    • Lack of investment and funding into social welfare issues, including providing a basic level of education for everyone to ensure a more level “playing field”.
  • Disease and inadequate healthcare
    • Lack of investment and funding into providing a basic level of hygiene and health care for everyone regardless of your social or geographical position.
  • War and conflict
    • Countries, groups or individuals looking to seize control of exterior territories or resources, either in the guise of defence, or beneficial gain.

How is abolishing money going to help I hear you cry, Surely the answer is to throw more money at these problems as that is the obvious fix. If that were true, then why isn’t this being done. Hardly a week goes by without some celeb appearing on our TVs from a war-torn, famine-stricken backdrop, imploring us to send some more money. And we do. Millions are raised, aid is sent, and yet the following year we get asked for even more money and then the following year for more still. The reason being, food, medication, clothing etc. all costs money and once the coffers are empty, there is no more aid. Remove money from the equation and we can provide as much food and medication as is required.

But I can hear the general outcry now, “Well, if I’m not getting paid, then I’m not working!”. Or alternatively, “Well, if everything is free, then I’m having it all and I’m just going to sit back, relax and enjoy it!”

Unfortunately, it wouldn’t work that way. If you want tech, TV and the latest fashions, we are still going to need people to make them. If you want food, then people will still need to work on farms and in factories in order to produce it all. These jobs will still need to be fulfilled as well as roles such as teachers, doctors, nurses, police officers, fire-fighters etc. We will still need people to work in factories and offices in order to manufacture and produce the things that we need and want. We will need to come together as a community, or rather a collection of communities and ensure that the jobs that need doing are done. If you want a new tablet, TV, or designer pair of shoes, you will need to ensure that you are making your contribution to society. That doesn’t mean that you will now have to work for Apple making iPads (other tablets are available), but you will need to ensure that you are contributing in some measurable way. If your skill is in education, then you will be required to teach. If caring for the sick is your vocation, then you will be a nurse or doctor. You get the idea.

Think of the benefit of not working for money because you must. Instead of doing a job that affords you to be able to pay your bills, you can do a job that you truly enjoy. How many of us would rather deliver the post, drive a bus, or work outside with our hands, rather than sit in front of a flickering screen doing meaningless tasks for ten hours a day. Instead, we can lead fulfilling lives, enjoying our work, knowing that we have contributed to our society. Worrying about paying bills, saving for trinkets and hollow rewards and just generally getting by will become things of the past. I truly believe that our values will change and rather than judging people by their jobs and possessions we will start to place an importance on their contributions to society. More importantly, we will start to enjoy our work and in turn take pride in our jobs as we will be doing something that we want to do as opposed to doing something we have to do.

However, I am not naive, and I understand that every solution brings its own problems. This will be a huge undertaking and it will need policing by the general population to ensure that everyone is contributing fairly. It will also require each communal group as well as society in general to ensure that no one individual or group is benefiting more than others. The usual yardstick for measuring power and wealth is money, so with this element removed, society will start to re-evaluate how it views groups and individuals.

Do I think this idealistic plan is achievable? Who knows? Probably not! But what is the alternative, carry on as we are, forever staggering on towards the abyss. The amount of money in the world is arguably more than it has ever been, but the number of people that share this wealth is smaller than ever before and getter smaller by the day. A handful of companies now turn over in excess of a trillion dollars a year each, whilst billions of people go without and struggle on a daily basis.

We are no longer staggering towards the abyss, but instead we are galloping headlong towards it. Grasping for the dollar bill that is dangling from a thread just beyond our grasp. We are told to try a bit harder, to reach a bit further to want it a bit more, but deep down we know it will always be just beyond the stretch of our fingertips.

So, do I think that abolishing money is achievable. I genuinely do as I believe that the majority of people want to do the right thing. They want to help their fellow man and see their communities flourish and grow. If they didn’t, these charities wouldn’t raise millions each time there was a new campaign to raise money for a worthy cause. How many times on TV do we see a community come together to help a family in need decorate or renovate their homes. I have faith in people’s compassion and kindness.

So, do I really think that abolishing money is the answer.

I’m really not sure – but I’m willing to give it a try. After all, when you have nothing, what have you got to lose.